首页> 外文OA文献 >Reduction in hospital readmission stay of elderly patients by a community based hospital discharge scheme: a randomised controlled trial.
【2h】

Reduction in hospital readmission stay of elderly patients by a community based hospital discharge scheme: a randomised controlled trial.

机译:通过基于社区的出院计划减少老年患者的住院再入院时间:一项随机对照试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE--To compare a community support scheme using care attendants with standard aftercare for their effects on independence and morale of elderly patients discharged from hospital and on their use of health and social services. DESIGN--Randomised controlled study of cohort of patients over 75 discharged to their own homes. SETTING--District general hospital and community. PATIENTS--Total of 903 patients (mean age 82, 25% over 85). INTERVENTIONS--Total of 464 patients received support from care attendants on first day at home and for up to 12 hours a week for two weeks. Support comprised practical care, help with rehabilitation, and organising social help. The remaining 439 patients received standard aftercare. END POINT--Difference between two groups of 7% in hospital readmission rates or one point on activities of daily living scale (power 80%, significance level 5%). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Three months after the initial discharge 763 patients were interviewed (84%). There were no significant differences between the two groups in physical independence (activities of daily living scale), in measures of morale (Philadelphia scale), or in death rates. Hospital readmission rates within 18 months of discharge, however, were significantly higher in the control group and they spent more days in hospital (mean; control group 30.6 days, support group 17.1 days; p = 0.014). Of the patients living alone who were followed up for 18 months 21 (15%) receiving standard aftercare were readmitted more than twice compared with 6 (5%) supported by care attendants (p less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS--If the findings are confirmed, and the policy extended to all patients over the age of 75 living alone, an average health district might expect either to save about 23 hospital beds at a net annual saving of about pounds 220,000 in the short term or to increase available beds by this number.
机译:研究目的-比较一项社区护理计划,该计划采用护理人员和标准的后期护理人员,对他们出院的老年患者的独立性和士气以及对他们使用卫生和社会服务的影响。设计-随机对照研究,研究了75位以上出院患者的队列。地点-地区综合医院和社区。患者-共有903名患者(平均年龄82,超过85岁的患者中有25%)。干预措施-共有464名患者在家里的第一天得到了护理人员的支持,并且每周最多接受12个小时的服务,持续了两个星期。支持包括实际护理,康复帮助以及组织社会帮助。其余439例患者接受了标准的后期护理。终点-两组住院率之间的差异为7%,或日常生活活动量的一个百分点(功效80%,显着性水平5%)。测量和主要结果-首次出院三个月后,对763例患者进行了访谈(84%)。两组在身体独立性(日常生活活动量),士气(费城量表)或死亡率方面无显着差异。然而,对照组在出院后18个月内的住院再入院率明显更高,并且他们在医院的住院时间更长(平均;对照组30.6天,支持组17.1天; p = 0.014)。在接受单独标准护理的18个月随访中,有21名患者(15%)被重新接纳两次以上,相比之下,护理员支持的6名患者(5%)则被重新接纳了两次(p小于0.01)。结论-如果发现得到证实,并且该政策扩展到所有75岁以上的独居患者,那么一个普通的医疗保健区可能会希望节省大约23张病床,短期内每年净节省22万英镑或增加此数目的可用床。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号